Documents in the IEC (and CISPR) go through a number of stages in the
adoption process.  Typically, the first version that goes out for comment
(but not vote) is a CD, or Committee Draft.  After the comments on the CD
are discussed, a CDV, or Committee Draft for Vote, is produced.  This goes
out to the National Committees for a 6(?) month voting period.  If the CDV
passes, any comments received with the votes are reconciled and an FDIS, or
Final Draft International Standard, is produced and sent out for vote
(again, 6 months).  If this passes the changes are included in the next
amendment to the standard involved.

This is a time consuming process.  There is a change to the definition of a
telecommunications port in CISPR 22 that has been in process since 1999.
The FDIS should be appearing soon with voting to conclude prior to the next
CISPR meetings in September.  3 years start to finish if all goes well.
About par for the course.  Some changes take much longer.  Notice that we
don't have limits above 1 GHz in CISPR 22?  CISPR has been working on that
issue for a long time.

Hope this helps.

Ghery Pettit
Intel
Member, USNC IEC / CISPR SC I TAG


-----Original Message-----
From: Gelfand, David [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: GTEM for full compliance testing?




What is a CDV?

Regards,

David

-----Original Message-----
From: John Woodgate [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 4:31 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: GTEM for full compliance testing?



I read in !emc-pstc that John Woodgate <[email protected]> wrote (in
<[email protected]>) about 'GTEM for full compliance
testing?', on Thu, 6 Dec 2001:
>I read in !emc-pstc that Gelfand, David <[email protected]>
>wrote (in <DAE684A26044B6469EF0A1E1565116820F0AFC@semsl131>) about 'GTEM
>for full compliance testing?', on Thu, 6 Dec 2001:
>>I imagine this has probably been discussed at length before.  Can full
>>compliance, emissions to FCC Part 15/ 55022  and rf radiated immunity to
>>55024/61000-4-3 be tested in a GTEM cell?  
>
>Not to 55024/61000-4-3. A new section, 61000-4-20, will be published
>next year and ***when/if it is called up in product standards such as
>55024*** it will be possible to use GTEM cells for full compliance.

The CDV is now issued, as a CISPR/A document.
-- 
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk

After swimming across the Hellespont, I felt like a Hero. 

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
     Dave Heald                [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
messages are imported into the new server.

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
     Dave Heald                [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
messages are imported into the new server.

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
     Dave Heald                [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.

Reply via email to