Since I have no experience with GTEMs just yet, I was wondering if it was necessary to re-orient the EUT or the transducer to 'see' emissions, particularly those at Ghz that tend to be beam-like and may require careful alignment to acquire the peak value. Kyle Ehler <mailto:[email protected]> LSI Logic Corporation
-----Original Message----- From: John Woodgate [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:31 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: GTEM for full compliance testing? I read in !emc-pstc that John Woodgate <[email protected]> wrote (in <[email protected]>) about 'GTEM for full compliance testing?', on Thu, 6 Dec 2001: >I read in !emc-pstc that Gelfand, David <[email protected]> >wrote (in <DAE684A26044B6469EF0A1E1565116820F0AFC@semsl131>) about 'GTEM >for full compliance testing?', on Thu, 6 Dec 2001: >>I imagine this has probably been discussed at length before. Can full >>compliance, emissions to FCC Part 15/ 55022 and rf radiated immunity to >>55024/61000-4-3 be tested in a GTEM cell? > >Not to 55024/61000-4-3. A new section, 61000-4-20, will be published >next year and ***when/if it is called up in product standards such as >55024*** it will be possible to use GTEM cells for full compliance. The CDV is now issued, as a CISPR/A document. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk After swimming across the Hellespont, I felt like a Hero. -------------------------------------------
