RE: stun guns on aircraftThe numbers of horrendous crimes in the US is sadly
exaggerated by the press.  The defensive use of weapons is sadly dismissed
in the news, and reported as a killing, not as a defense against killing.

I don't own my handgun for entertainment, but for protection.  My bolt
action rifle is too unwieldy and clumsy.  I'm not easy about depriving
another's life, except when mine is threatened.

I'm glad you've never had to face a weapon.  Even though I live in the state
known for having many guns, I've never seen a gun used in a crime either.
None is not better than none.  It's just great.  I hope that if you ever
have to face a weapon that you'd be able to disarm him and restrain him
until the authorities arrive.  I have a black belt associate who has made
the statement he'd rather face a crook that has a gun than one with a knife.
The crook that uses a gun is usually too cocky, and can be disarmed fairly
easily with the right moves, where a knife wielder is usually a force to be
reckoned.

Sam
  -----Original Message-----
  From: FLOWERDEW, Peter [mailto:[email protected]]
  Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 11:17 AM
  To: 'Sam Davis'; Gert Gremmen; Pettit, Ghery; 'Ted Rook'; <
  Subject: RE: stun guns on aircraft


  I am reading this thread in the UK. I am a trained marksman, trained by
our police, but I can not believe what I am reading. How many murders per
day in New York? How many in any European capital? How many school massacres
in USA? How many in Europe? In Europe the police carry guns, not the next
guy who is going to object to my driving.

  I also happen to be a karate instructor, a professional doorman (bouncer)
and I train nurses and counsellors, working with addicts and alcoholics off
the streets, in low-arousal defence techniques and situation de-escalation -
as well as being an FIEE emc engineer. I get scared in Houston at night
(that's where an English engineer got lost, knocked on the door of  a house
to ask directions and was shot dead through the door - anyone want to talk
to his wife?), but in four years I have never faced a gun on the nightclub
doors in Bristol. Also, our gun enthusiasts do not own handguns, combat
rifles or pump-action shotguns - they still have fun.

  I will not be the only UK professional reading this thread and from the
reactions in my company, which is American owned, the ease with which people
are willing to deprive another human of their life is shocking.

  All that said, I do not see what the topic has to do with meeting health
and safety regulations. Which standard are you referring to?

  Peter

  -----Original Message-----
  From: Sam Davis [mailto:[email protected]]
  Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 2:51 PM
  To: Gert Gremmen; Pettit, Ghery; 'Ted Rook'; <
  Subject: RE: stun guns on aircraft




  This has nothing to do with EMC or Product safety, but with personal and
  public safety.

  I'm with Ghery.  Gert, your misrepresentation of his statement is
ludicrous.
  Statistics bear this out.  Crime rates drop drastically in nations where
  guns are freely owned by the PUBLIC.  Look at Australia.  The gov't took
the
  gun ownership rights away, and violent crime rose horribly.

  Guns are not only offensive weapons, but defensive weapons as well.  If
some
  criminal approaches your wife with a gun, would you prefer her to have a
  pistol, or a whistle?

  What do you want your cops to defend your streets with?  What about your
  military, to guard your ability to go to work, make a living, support your
  family, without having to worry if you'll be a captive prisoner of war, or
  worse?  What about the security force at your airport?

  Guns even the playing field.

  When you outlaw guns, only outlaws have guns.  Law abiding citizens turn
  them in, and can no longer defend their homes with the NECESSARY force.
  Fortunately, I live in a locale where gun ownership is not only allowed,
but
  almost expected.  Statistically, there are more guns than people per
  household.  There is also a very low rate of home invasion.
  Since concealed carry permits have been issued, all violent crimes have
  dropped.

  Hijackers take planes because law-abiding travelers are not packing heat.

  I own multiple guns, legally, and I pray I never have to fire them in self
  defense, but I pray I don't have to use my AD&D policy either.

  BTW, Ted, your statement "Unfortunately America was taken by force and is
  defended by force and is unlikely ever to change", I disagree with your
  first syllable.  The reason we're the prime superpower is because the
world
  knows we will use it if we have to.  The reason our allies like us is
  because we've got their back, (and we've thrown billions of dollars to
bail
  them out without actually expecting payback, but that's a completely
  different thread).

  Remember grade school, who got picked on?  The kid that couldn't (or
  wouldn't) defend himself.  The guys that were obviously able to return
  injury never had to fight.  Think about that.

  If any of my statements offend you because of your national pride, I'm
  sorry.  My national pride is what brought me in here.  I mean no offense
to
  your nation, just your government's  anti-gun laws.

  My opinions are my own, but I know my boss will back me.  He's a member,
  too.

  Proud member of the National Rifle Association, standing with my brothers,
  supporting our constitutional right to protect ourselves until the cops
are
  able to arrive.

  Sam
  -----Original Message-----
  From: [email protected]
  [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Gert Gremmen
  Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 12:25 AM
  To: Pettit, Ghery; 'Ted Rook'; <
  Subject: RE: stun guns on aircraft




  So Ghery,

  Please let us all know your future flight schedual, so
  we can avoid sharing the same plane ...

  As you might know, yesterday, in analogy to USA 1963 Kennedy, a
  Netherlands Prime Minister kandidate , Pim Fortuin,
  a fighter for the rights for free speaking, to the degree
  that he attacked laws against discrimination, was
  killed by a such representative of the TRUE FREE MEN .

  I supposed , Ghery , that your interpretation of being
  a FREE man is not limited to the WORD...

  Gert Gremmen

  -----Original Message-----
  From: [email protected]
  [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Pettit, Ghery
  Sent: dinsdag 7 mei 2002 01:24
  To: 'Ted Rook'; <
  Subject: RE: stun guns on aircraft




  I've resisted jumping in in this fashion, but -

  FREE MEN OWN GUNS!

  Those who will trade essential freedoms for temporary security deserve
  neither - Benjamin Franklin.

  Folks, the 2nd Amendment pre-dates the wild west by a long time.  Those of
  us who value our RIGHTS are tired of the wimps in the world trying to take
  them away.

  Ghery S. Pettit
  Life Member, National Rifle Association



  -----Original Message-----
  From: Ted Rook [mailto:[email protected]]
  Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 1:08 PM
  To: <
  Subject: stun guns on aircraft




  and other safety considerations

  keep the hijackers off planes using ground security

  an airplane in flight is not the place to have gun fights

  too many lives are at risk

  the first priority is to get the plane safely on the ground, anywhere

  then at least the passengers have a chance

  Most citizens of most countries enjoy the security that comes from having
  thrashed out land rights, territorial disputes, and the systems of law and
  law enforcement before firearms were invented.

  America is one of the few places in the West that relies on firearms as a
  negotiating tool.
  This is poor judgement.
  Firearms are offensive weapons not negotiating tools.
  Giving someone a gun escalates an already dangerous situation.
  Now you want the pilot to not only assure the safety of the plane but also
  be an effective executioner.
  Asking too much IMHO.
  Unfortunately America was taken by force and is defended by force and is
  unlikely ever to change.





  -------------------------------------------
  This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
  Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

  Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

  To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
       [email protected]
  with the single line:
       unsubscribe emc-pstc

  For help, send mail to the list administrators:
       Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
       Dave Heald:               [email protected]

  For policy questions, send mail to:
       Richard Nute:           [email protected]
       Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

  All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
      http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
      Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"

  -------------------------------------------
  This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
  Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

  Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

  To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
       [email protected]
  with the single line:
       unsubscribe emc-pstc

  For help, send mail to the list administrators:
       Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
       Dave Heald:               [email protected]

  For policy questions, send mail to:
       Richard Nute:           [email protected]
       Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

  All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
      http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
      Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"



  -------------------------------------------
  This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
  Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

  Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

  To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
       [email protected]
  with the single line:
       unsubscribe emc-pstc

  For help, send mail to the list administrators:
       Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
       Dave Heald:               [email protected]

  For policy questions, send mail to:
       Richard Nute:           [email protected]
       Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

  All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
      http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
      Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"



  -------------------------------------------
  This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
  Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

  Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

  To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
       [email protected]
  with the single line:
       unsubscribe emc-pstc

  For help, send mail to the list administrators:
       Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
       Dave Heald:               [email protected]

  For policy questions, send mail to:
       Richard Nute:           [email protected]
       Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

  All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
      http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
      Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"

Reply via email to