I don't know a standard but I can tell you that you don't need to measure it
and how to do it if you still want to.

Quoting MIL-STD-461E para. 4.3.2.1: " Minimum performance of the material
shall be as specified in Table I.  The manufacturer's certification of their
RF absorber material (basic material only, not installed) is acceptable."

And from the appendix para. 40.3.2.1: "It is intended that the values in
Table I can be met with available ferrite tile material or standard 24 inch
(0.61 meters) pyramidal absorber material."

Table 1 is as follows:

Frequency               Minimum absorption
80 MHz - 250 MHz            6 dB
above 250 MHz               10 dB

Measuring absorption is conceptually easy.  Aim two antennas at a bare metal
surface.  Drive one and receive with the other.  Record transmit and receive
levels.  Place absorber on bare wall and repeat measurement.  The difference
in dB is the absorption.

This is a very easy test to do at microwave frequencies where you can use a
high gain horn, because you can put the receive horn in back of the transmit
horn and be in a back lobe and minimize antenna-antenna coupling.  But this
doesn't work at 80 MHz with a biconical.  My advice would be to get what the
mil-std says and rely on the manufacturer certification.  If you insist on
checking performance at 80 MHz, here is my non-standard and esoteric advice
- I welcome other practical and perhaps more ingenious approaches.

Make the following measurement in the unlined (bare-walled) chamber:  Set up
two biconicals at random positions in the room but at least one meter apart
from each other and well away from walls (following mil-spec guidelines for
antenna separation from walls and ceiling and floor).  Apply 0 dBm into one
antenna and record received power in other antenna.  Do this while sweeping
the biconical range, 20 - 200 MHz.  You will see large variations in peaks
and valleys due to room reflections.  Repeat this measurement after you have
lined the chamber.  If the variations between peaks and valleys has
decreased by the amount listed In Table 1, you have a successful
installation.  A slightly more sophisticated version of this test is to use
a paddle to stir the room with the spectrum analyzer in a max hold mode, and
record until all sharp dips are gone.  Repeat this with the room lined.  The
level at each frequency should then be down by the mil-std table 1 value
assigned to that frequency.

Final advice.  Tiles are expensive but they take up less room.  If you are
retrofitting a small chamber, you may have to go with tiles to retain enough
empty volume to perform testing.  The tiles are spec'd from 30 - 1000 MHz.
Since the mil-std takes you above 1 GHz, you need the hybrid tiles with
cones glued on to give you anechoic performance all the way to 18 or 40 GHz
(assuming you go the tile route).

Ken Javor
  




on 1/11/02 2:32 PM, [email protected] at
[email protected] wrote:

> 
> Can anyone point me to a reference for measuring the absorption of anechoic
> material to verify the requirements as specified in MIL-STD-462D?
> 
> Thanks,
> Susan Beard
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> 
> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
> 
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
> [email protected]
> with the single line:
> unsubscribe emc-pstc
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
> Dave Heald                [email protected]
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Richard Nute:           [email protected]
> Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old messages
> are imported into the new server.
> 


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
     Dave Heald                [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.

Reply via email to