I read in !emc-pstc that [email protected] wrote (in <LFENJLPMMJB
[email protected]>) about 'SV: Selection of
Directives', on Sat, 5 Jan 2002:
> I wish I had seen this "magical matrix", but unfortunately I have not. I
> assume that a matrix like this would be very complex and comprehensive.
No, a matrix is perhaps the best way of handling the subject
>
> Example: An ITE would have to qualify for EMCD and maybe RTTE,
RTTE only in respect of any relevant interface.
> maybe also
> LVD if the voltages are within the scope
Yes. Quite normal.
>and if it is placed in an explosive
> area then the ATEX directive might also apply.
Well, it would apply.
>A lot of maybe's and if's
No, the matter seems quite clear. What uncertainty do you have in mind?
> .......
> I think we have to gain knowledge about a lot of the directives in order
> to
> know if a product falls within it. A matrix can not include that type of
> experience.... I think.
Header and one line of a matrix:
Equipment LVD EMCD RTTE ATEX
ITE YES YES Modem interface Only if intended for
Bluetooth explosive atmosphere
>
> I'm looking forward to hear other inputs from the list members.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
After swimming across the Hellespont, I felt like a Hero.
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
Dave Heald [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old
messages are imported into the new server.
