Has anyone heard what the level of complaints that government agencies have been getting from devices such as ITE?
I seem to remember Don Bush telling me he had discussed this with a regulatory body and found the answer was zero or near zero. Which Don pointed out meant the current levels and testing methods were sufficient or maybe too tight. Jim > Can anyone tell us the driving reason behind this regulation? Was > it to increase repeatability at test sites? Was it to reduce the number of > interference complaints from ITE installations? ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/ Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
