Dave Cuthbert wrote >> The nick name for MFJ is "Mighty Fine Junk". <<
Yes it is -- or has been. But I'll jump in here to add that while I've in the past often been underwhelmed by the quality of some MFJ equipment, I was favorably impressed with my MFJ-259B. And it is quite useful. I have one of the Autek devices as well, but I prefer the MFJ 259 for test use. This may be because my Autek is the low-end model, lacking some capabilities the MFJ has. Autek does make a more functional model, and their analyzers are MUCH smaller and lighter than MFJ's. Cortland This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line. All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
