For what it is worth I did a little research tonight. I have a copy of VDE 0550 part 1, dated 3.59. :
It makes no mention of the indoor use only symbol. But is does show classifications for different types of enclosures using the water drop markings. The "Protected Type" meaning with an enclosure but with no protection against water must have no drop symbol.. However, the marking requirements in the same standard, state in part: With apparatus of " protected type" the words "Only for dry locations" shall be included. I looked at old copies of BS 3535 dated 1962, CEE 15 dated 1964, nor IEC 742 dated 1983. There is no such requirement in any of those, for the text or the symbol. I don't have the latest transformer standard. It appears that the international transformer standards simply rely on the IP index ratings. No mark - don't let it get wet.. I have seen the indoor use only symbol on many direct plug in sample transformer (destined for markets in Europe) and never on other appliances. I told vendors they could eliminate it if they wished because it was unnecessary. I suppose the VDE 0550 warning was a requirement that the CEE considered unnecessary. My guess is that the symbol came into use (due to the translation requirement) and is still alive today even though the requirement for it disappeared about 40 years ago - at least in the transformer standards I have used. Hats off to John Barnes for locating the Japanese Jate Mark! 73's John. Best Regards, Lou Aiken, LaMer LLC 27109 Palmetto Drive Orange Beach, AL 36561 USA tel ++ 1 251 981 6786 fax ++ 1 251 981 3054 Cell ++ 1 251 979 4648 From: Rich Nute <ri...@sdd.hp.com> To: <gary.mcintu...@worldwidepackets.com> Cc: Product Safety Technical Committee <emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org> Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 5:25 PM Subject: Re: strange symbols (to me anyway) > > > > > Hi Gary: > > > As a result of searching for my copy of the > "indoor use only" symbol, I discovered that > I have a reference to the standard where the > symbol is published: > > DIN 30 600 Reg. No. 02808-3 > > If one of our subscribers has a copy of this > standard, perhaps he could verify the > reference. If possible, I'd like a copy of > the page that describes this symbol. > > (Or, we could post the copy to our new emc- > pstc web site for all to see.) > > > Best regards, > Rich > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------- > This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety > Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. > > Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ > > To cancel your subscription, send mail to: > majord...@ieee.org > with the single line: > unsubscribe emc-pstc > > For help, send mail to the list administrators: > Ron Pickard: emc-p...@hypercom.com > Dave Heald: davehe...@attbi.com > > For policy questions, send mail to: > Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org > Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org > > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: > http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/ > Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list" > This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: emc-p...@hypercom.com Dave Heald: davehe...@attbi.com For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/ Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
