I read in !emc-pstc that [email protected] wrote (in <F7E9180F6F7F58 [email protected]>) about '60950 clauses' on Tue, 18 Feb 2003: >The index of my copy of EN 60950:2000 refers to non-existent clauses (e.g., >7.x, 1.2.13.14, etc). Is is safe to assume that these are "typos" ?
No. It sounds as though you may have a copy of doubtful provenance, e.g. an early committee draft, passed off as the final publication. If so, it will certainly have many more errors, which you will not be able to detect. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to http://www.isce.org.uk PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL! This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line. All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
