I was not going to add to this discussion,
but this message is going to far.
World wide liberty of expression -in decent terms-
positive or negative, about any commercial
entity MUST  be allowed.

If the IEEE is going to "lick the heels" of
companies who are very well able to defend themselves,
then the EMC-SCTC list will have received
the last contribution from me.

Agilent/HP has taken several decisions in the past 
that were -seen from the point of customers- ,
well justified by a many of the remarks that has been
posted on this list.

I believe that instead of writing this -invitation
to auto-censure- the IEEE could have asked Agilent
to write an reply from their point of view.

I have been considering to become a member of IEEE,
this contribution has definely put that on the 
long list.

Regards,

Gert Gremmen
ce-test, qualified testing
Rotterdam, The Netherlands 

http://www.ce-test.nl




From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of David Heald
Sent: vrijdag 7 februari 2003 21:25
To: [email protected]
Subject: Apology to Agilent Technologies and Hewlett-Packard
Importance: High



To:  Agilent Technologies and Hewlett-Packard:


  The administrators of the IEEE emc-pstc listserver
  apologize to Agilent Technologies and Hewlett-Packard
  for the derogatory remarks recently posted to this
  listserver.

  We take every effort to maintain a high level of
  professionalism in postings.  Because of our high-
  level expectations, we do not moderate the postings.
  Occasionally, some inappropriate content is posted,
  and we immediately notify our subscribers and seek
  to quench any further inappropriate content.

  We did notify our subscribers.  Unfortunately, a
  number of inappropriate remarks were posted before
  our notice was fully distributed.

  On this occasion, as in other similar occastions,
  some of our subscribers send us private responses
  supporting our action.  While we wish these actions
  were not necessary, we do find that these actions
  generally help to improve the level of professionalism.

  We believe the remarks were personal opinions and
  did not represent employers' views.

  We will amend our rules, sent to each new subscriber,
  to clarify that such remarks are out of order.

  If any subscriber wishes to discuss this matter
  further, please do so via private e-mail to the
  administrators.


  On behalf of all administrators,
  Dave Heald
  co-Administrator, IEEE emc-pstc listserver



This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc





This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to