To answer the question regarding relaxation of test levels in EN 61326,
there is no relaxation of the rf-immunity test levels for the ITU
frequencies (or any frequency) as was the case with the generic standards.

Best Regards,
Norm Provost

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 7:53 AM
> To:   [email protected]
> Subject:      RE: RADIATED IMMUNITY REQUIREMENTS FOR EN61326
> 
> 
> 
> Has anyone answered the question of whether or not 61326 has provisions
> for
> a reduction in the field strength at those frequencies?
> 
> Lisa
> 
> 
>  
> 
>                       Mike  Hopkins
> 
>                       <michael.hopkins@therm        To:       "'Ken
> Javor'" <[email protected]>, "Gordon,Ian"                     
>                       o.com>
> <[email protected]>, "'IEEE EMC-PSTC GROUP'"
> <[email protected]>    
>                       Sent by:                      cc:
> 
>                       owner-emc-pstc@majordo        Subject:  RE: RADIATED
> IMMUNITY REQUIREMENTS FOR EN61326                                
>                       mo.ieee.org
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>                       03/03/2003 04:07 PM
> 
>                       Please respond to Mike
> 
>                       Hopkins
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I believe the other bands are television broadcast....
> 
> M. Hopkins
> Thermo KeyTek
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Javor [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 11:03 AM
> To: Gordon,Ian; 'IEEE EMC-PSTC GROUP'
> Subject: Re: RADIATED IMMUNITY REQUIREMENTS FOR EN61326
> 
> 
> 
> Hazarding a guess.  I am not near a spectrum usage chart, but clearly
> 87-108
> is the FM broadcast band, and therefore no one else is transmitting at
> these
> frequencies, except at very low power.  If the other bands listed are also
> restricted to broadcasters of a certain power, and you can calculate that
> the closest you might ever approach the source would limit you to a 3 V/m
> exposure, then the relaxation would make sense.  Like I said though, just
> a
> guess.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> on 3/3/03 8:01 AM, Gordon,Ian at [email protected] wrote:
> 
> >
> > Everybody
> > Can you advise me as to whether the same reduction in field strength is
> > available when applying the industrial immunity requirements of EN61326
> as
> > when applying the generic industrial immunity standard EN61000-6-2.
> > EN61000-6-2 permits a reduction in field strength from 10 to 3 V/m over
> the
> > following frequency ranges :
> > 87 - 108 MHz
> > 174 - 230 MHz
> > 470 - 790 MHz
> >
> > Furthermore, I have never been able to work out why there is a
> relaxation
> at
> > these freqs. The wording from table 1 of EN61000-6-2 is
> ....10V/m........
> > "Except for the ITU broadcast frequency bands (given above) where the
> level
> > shall be 3V/m".
> > Can anyone provide the "logic" behind this clause? (I'm sure there is
> > some!).
> >
> > Thanks
> > Ian Gordon
> >
> > _____________________________________________________________________
> > This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by the WorldCom Internet
> Managed
> > Scanning Service - powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit
> > http://www.worldcom.com
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> > This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> > Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> >
> > Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
> >
> > To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
> > [email protected]
> > with the single line:
> > unsubscribe emc-pstc
> >
> > For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> > Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
> > Dave Heald:               [email protected]
> >
> > For policy questions, send mail to:
> > Richard Nute:           [email protected]
> > Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
> >
> > Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
> > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> > http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> >
> 
> --
> 
> Ken Javor
> EMC Compliance
> Huntsville, Alabama
> 256/650-5261
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> 
> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
> 
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>      [email protected]
> with the single line:
>      unsubscribe emc-pstc
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>      Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
>      Dave Heald:               [email protected]
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>      Richard Nute:           [email protected]
>      Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
> 
> Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>     http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> 
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> 
> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
> 
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>      [email protected]
> with the single line:
>      unsubscribe emc-pstc
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>      Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
>      Dave Heald:               [email protected]
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>      Richard Nute:           [email protected]
>      Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
> 
> Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>      http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> 
> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
> 
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>      [email protected]
> with the single line:
>      unsubscribe emc-pstc
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>      Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
>      Dave Heald:               [email protected]
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>      Richard Nute:           [email protected]
>      Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
> 
> Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>     http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc


This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to