I agree in all regards. > From: "Ron Pickard" <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "Ron Pickard" <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 11:03:32 -0700 > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Check list for PCB Layout > > > > Hi Thomas, > > CHECKLIST > A checklist that you are requesting may be difficult to come by. I say this > because most, if not > all, people who create these types of documents do so from a base of personal > experience and > knowledge whereby they are unwilling to share. There is also the probably that > these documents may > be proprietary to the creator's employer. And, as I do not know your level of > expertise in this > area, basic PWB layout rules knowledge regarding EMC and SI may be learned > from the many very good > books and seminars on this subject as another member has already pointed out. > So, I personally > suggest that you either create your own checklist that would be tailored to > your, and your > employer's, needs and requirements or hire a consultant that's knowledgeable > in this area to assist > you. > > CLOSE-FIELD PROBES > Unfortunately, there's no predictable correlation of near-field measurement > results to the far-field > measurement results that would be obtained from an OATS where verification is > formalized. Although > close-field probes are useful for tracking down emission sources, they cannot > and should not be used > for any kind of qualitative verification. > > I hope this helps. Comments anyone? > > Best regards, > > Ron Pickard > [email protected] > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 6:21 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Check list for PCB Layout > > Hi everybody, > > I would like to create a check list in order to help designers and PCB routers > of my company to > improve their design / EMI and SI. Where can I find documentations (PDF, > links...) with basics PCB > rules regarding EMI and SI ?? > > Witch kind of tests can I set up to verify radiations only with two close > field probes ? Is there > some referencies (standards, norms...) for close fields levels ? Can I measure > them?? > > Thanks. > > Thomas K. > Genius Institute > > > > ------------------------------------------- > This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety > Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. > > Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ > > To cancel your subscription, send mail to: > [email protected] > with the single line: > unsubscribe emc-pstc > > For help, send mail to the list administrators: > Ron Pickard: [email protected] > Dave Heald: [email protected] > > For policy questions, send mail to: > Richard Nute: [email protected] > Jim Bacher: [email protected] > > Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line. > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: > http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc >
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line. All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
