Actually..... /Whine mode on/ 

I have found EMC testing of component power supplies to be a bit more "taking"
than end-use system testing. My employer must invent all manner of
PRE-compliance test conditions and attempt to emulate many of the different
installations used by customers.

With the exception of ESD, most EMC tests take a bit longer than equivalent
testing that I have performed on end-use equipment at previous employers.

/Whine mode off/ 

Just my humble and confused opinion... 

luck, 
Brian 


All, 

I just want to make sure that everyone understands that I've had relatively
good experience with Vicor parts.  Their tech support has been supportive. 
Their people have been helping me even before I posed my question to the
EMC-PSTC. 

I go through great pains to select components with the proper
testing/approvals to back them up; and yet we almost always meet some sort of
compliance test SNAFU.  This has happened with parts from all sorts of
manufacturers (including ourselves).  

As a product manufacturer, I envy the component manufacturers, such as Vicor, 
in that they only have to EMC test a component, not a system with 26 different
ports and peripherals...; however I understand that they must pull their hair
out trying to support the thousands of different applications that their users
come up with. 

I also take comfort in the fact that I am probably the only person who will
ever compliance test our products.  I have the advantage of "single
jeaopardy".   A component manufacturer gets their products tested possibly
hundreds of times a year.   I would be amazed if this testing doesn't turn up
a surprise or two.

So, please cut Vicor some slack; but please keep those design tips coming. 
I'd like nothing better than to keep NetTest and Vicor both in business :-)

Thanks, 

Chris Maxwell 



Reply via email to