I read in !emc-pstc that Gibling, Vic <vic.gibl...@e2vtechnologies.com> wrote (in <4f826f960057d4118ec3009027e245380946d...@whl17.e2v.uk>) about 'fan question' on Thu, 18 Sep 2003: >A view of an international test house considers two simultaneous faults >if one is 'invisible' to an operator. The example given was an >overtemperature control - status unknown by operator - and a blocked >fan.
This is 'gold-plating' the standard, if two-fault conditions are not covered in it, and any test-house that rejects a product on that basis should be boycotted and reported to the regulatory authorities, unless they restrict their activity to *advising* on such a situation. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to http://www.isce.org.uk PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL! This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: emc-p...@hypercom.com Dave Heald: emc_p...@symbol.com For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line. All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
