I read in !emc-pstc that David Sproul <[email protected]> wrote (in <[email protected] >) about 'More CE mark issues...' on Tue, 11 Nov 2003:
>As you will be aware, a recent string in this group has been discussing >when to CE mark and when not. I will dare to suggest that since without >the ATE your IA is an expensive paperweight, you need not CE mark it. >However, this does not release you from your obligations to ensure it is >safe for your customers to use. It isn't subject to the question of whether it's sold as an 'after- market' product though, I suppose. It definitely needs to have both Directives applied, *as far as they can apply* and be marked, if it CAN be supplied other than to the military. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to http://www.isce.org.uk PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL! This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line. All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
