I read in !emc-pstc that Price, Ed <[email protected]> wrote (in <[email protected]>) about 'Equipment Calibration' on Fri, 7 Nov 2003:
> So I proposed that these items be tagged with some kind of > "uncalibrated" or "user verified" or "no calibration required" > label. My understanding is that this IS permissible. > The gurus of Metrology say this can't be done, our ISO9000 > Quality System will not allow this. That may be so, but it doesn't HAVE to prohibit it, AIUI. It DOES have to have a documented procedure for the use of uncalibrated equipment. >I can't understand how a > customer-oriented quality system can't be crafted to meet the needs > of all of the customers of that system. Indeed. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to http://www.isce.org.uk PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL! This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line. All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
