Back to CISPR A. The proposal was prEN 50147-2, but it was retracted and sent back to committee. Dr. Martin Alexander of the National Physical Laboratory in the UK was a major driver in its development. Maybe someone on the list can tell us whats happened since. Brent DeWitt
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 12:37 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: OATS Measurement In a message dated 1/29/2004 12:39:57 PM Central Standard Time, [email protected] writes: At what point will with EMC community scrap the OATS? Is appears that the OATS measurement methodology is broken. When it was designed, there were relatively few intentional radiators, where as now, the majority of the spectrum is blanketed with ambients. As a community we have learned a great deal more about radiated emissions and their measurement technologies. I vote for scraping the OATS and redesigning the system better. Why keep band-aiding it? Mat There was a move to go to a fully anechoic chamber... I wonder where that went? Derek N. Walton Owner, L F Research EMI Design and Test Facility Poplar Grove, IL 61065
