I read in !emc-pstc that Carpentier Kristiaan <Kristiaan.Carpentier@thom son.net> wrote (in <421CB3B9B2D2F645B548D213C0A90E5501A0477A@edgmsmsg01. eu.thmulti.com>) about 'IEC60950, "extreme hazards"' on Tue, 4 May 2004:
>In 60950-1, Clause 2.8.4 and 2.8.6, the wording "extreme hazard" is used, >while other parts of the standard just mention the word "hazard". >Is there a definition of "extreme hazard" ? It appears not. >Is there a difference between >"hazard" and "extreme hazard"? Yes. But how (or even 'whether') it could be defined is quite another matter. The eagle-eyed editorial critics seem to have missed that point. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
