I've often wondered...

Most people who have an ESD gun have a spectrum analyzer.

Most ESD guns have a multiple discharge setting.  

What if you made a "coupling strip", such as a 12 inch long x 1 inch
wide piece of copper tape mounted on a board; then used two 970 Ohm
resistors to bond the strip to the ground reference plane (probably
would want to make this connection with some kind of clip so you could
connect/disconnect easily); then set up a jig which would hold a coax
near field probe (the homemade kind with the end cut and the center
conductor protruding a little bit) a fixed distance from this coupling
strip.

It seems that you could take your freshly calibrated ESD gun and
discharge to the strip with your spectrum analyzer set on peak hold and
a span covering 100 to 1000Mhz.  You could make a number of discharges,
say 10 or 20.

Then you would have a "spectral signature" of your freshly calibrated
ESD gun.

Couldn't you then repeat the process daily and compare the signature to
the original?

Sorry that I haven't done this myself.  I just thought of this idea this
morning.  

Can any of the group's gurus see a hole in this idea?

Chris Maxwell
Design Engineer
Nettest


From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Epstein
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 4:16 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: ESD Gun Verification between calibrations


That actually works.  Just zap the inside of your arm and measure the
welt.

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
        Sent: Thu 4/22/2004 11:18 AM 
        To: [email protected]; [email protected] 
        Cc: [email protected] 
        Subject: RE: ESD Gun Verification between calibrations
        
        


        I often test 9 volt batteries with my tongue. A similar
technique can be
        used to test the ESD gun. Just discharge it to your arm and gage
the
        performance by how it feels. Just kidding, sort of.
        
          Dave Cuthbert
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: [email protected]
        [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Gordon,Ian
        Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 1:46 AM
        To: Kevin Harris
        Cc: EMC-PSTC ([email protected])
        Subject: RE: ESD Gun Verification between calibrations
        
        
        
        Kevin
        You are only verifying that the equipment is working so there is
no need
        to
        check absolute levels or waveforms etc, that is the function of
the
        calibration.
        Our EMC lab has been assessed to ISO 17025 by TUV International
and they
        are
        satisfied with the following procedure which is extracted from
our EMC
        lab
        Quality Manual.
        In our in-house EMC reports (which TUV are prepared to endorse)
we
        record
        the latest date of calibration. Following the next calibration
we assess
        whether there is a requirement to repeat any work based on the
outcome
        of
        that calibration i.e. if the device is outside the manufacturers
        specification we repeat the work performed in the intervening
period.
        
         1.   EQUIPMENT USED FOR BS EN 61000-4-2
        a)    Electro-static discharge gun
                S/N: 2494
                In house equipment No. 9853-22-998
        
        METHOD:
        1.      Configure item a as per section 6.5 of EMC lab
instruction
        manual.
                                        (Details configuration as per
        manufacturers
        instructions)
        2.      Set the ESD gun to 8kV air discharge, single shot.
        3.      Attempt to discharge the gun to the insulating block (a
block of
        wood 100 x 150 x 700mm) on the earth plane.
        4.      Check that a discharge did not occur by observing no
audible
        signal
        from the gun and the display of the gun indicates 0.0kV.
        5.      Attempt to discharge the gun to the earth plane.
        6.      Check that a discharge did occur by observing an audible
signal
        from
        the gun and the display of the gun indicates over 6kV.
        7.      Update the Equipment checklist spreadsheet to show that
these
        pieces
        of equipment are functioning correctly.
        
        Ian Gordon
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Ken Javor [mailto:[email protected]]
        Sent: 21 April 2004 20:51
        To: Kevin Harris; EMC-PSTC ([email protected])
        Subject: Re: ESD Gun Verification between calibrations
        
        
        Never done this before, so this is shooting from the hip.  If
you have a
        receiver, as opposed to an analyzer, you could, using sufficient
        attenuation, drive the input directly or using some transducer
to
        measure
        the spectral signature from dc to daylight right after
calibration, and
        run
        checks against that for intermediate checks.  If you have an
analyzer
        with
        even rudimentary preselection, you can do the same.  Obviously
you would
        have to use the max hold function and run multiple shots.  I
don't know
        how
        fast those things recharge - if it takes a long time that would
make
        this
        technique impractical.
        
        
        From: Kevin Harris <[email protected]>
        Reply-To: Kevin Harris <[email protected]>
        Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:51:04 -0400
        To: "EMC-PSTC ([email protected])" <[email protected]>
        Subject: ESD Gun Verification between calibrations
        
        
        
        
        
        Dear Colleagues,
        
        We are in the process of moving some of the ESD testing we
currently do
        (as
        pre-compliance to formal testing at an agency or test house) to
formal
        testing under a laboratory accreditation program. In that
regard, the
        issue
        of verification of the ESD gun's performance has come up between
        calibration
        cycles. Short of spending a lot of coin on a scope with a very
fast one
        shot
        capture and running the formal calibration test as a method of
periodic
        verification, does anyone have some suggestions for alternative
methods
        that
        aren't so expensive but would still satisfy an accreditor as
being a
        reasonable approach.
        
        Thanks
        
        Kind Regards,
        
        Kevin Harris
        Manager, Approvals Group
        Digital Security Controls
        3301 Langstaff Road
        Concord, Ontario
        CANADA
        L4K 4L2
        Tel: +1 905 760 3000 Ext. 2378
        Fax +1 905 760 3020
        Email: [email protected]
        
        
        
        
        
_____________________________________________________________________
        This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by MCI's Internet
Managed
        Scanning
        Services - powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit
        http://www.mci.com
        
        
***********************************************************************
        This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of
the
        individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions
presented are
        solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of the
        BOC Group plc or any of its affiliates. If you are not the
intended
        recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error
and
        that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of
this
        email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in
error
        please return the message to the sender by replying to it and
then
        delete the message from your computer.
        
        This footnote also confirms that this email message has been
checked by
        anti-virus software for the presence of computer viruses.
However, the
        BOC Group plc or any of its affiliates accepts no responsibility
for any
        virus or defect that might arise from opening this e-mail or
        attachments.
        
        -------------------------------------------
        This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
        Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
        
        Visit our web site at:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
        
        To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
             [email protected]
        with the single line:
             unsubscribe emc-pstc
        
        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
             Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
             Dave Heald:               [email protected]
        
        For policy questions, send mail to:
             Richard Nute:           [email protected]
             Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
        
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
            http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
        
        
        -------------------------------------------
        This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
        Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
        
        Visit our web site at:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
        
        To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
             [email protected]
        with the single line:
             unsubscribe emc-pstc
        
        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
             Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
             Dave Heald:               [email protected]
        
        For policy questions, send mail to:
             Richard Nute:           [email protected]
             Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
        
        All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
            http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
        




This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc





This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to