I read in !emc-pstc that [email protected] wrote (in <3dpc801abif84 [email protected]>) about 'EN61000-3-2 repeatability test' on Wed, 21 Apr 2004: >If we had realized this type of 'repeatability' test was to be applied when >we designed the product, it would have been taken into account.
It wasn't intended to be applies in the way your test house is doing it: it's a misunderstanding. Leave it for a week or three and it should be resolved. >We thought the >PFC design was successful when the emissions were far below the limit line. Your thought was correct. In respect of my part in editing the Millennium Amendment to IEC 61000-3-2, I apologise for the resulting confusion. I will do all I can to resolve it as quickly as possible. But it's not quite as simple as it appears. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
