Josh
Although not referred to in EN61326 can you apply EN55014-1 to your product?
This provides for assessment of discontinuous interference.
Scope of EN 55014-1:

ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY -
REQUIREMENTS FOR HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES,
ELECTRIC TOOLS AND SIMILAR APPARATUS -
Part 1: Emission
1 Scope
1.1 This standard applies to the conduction and the radiation of
radio-frequency disturbances
>from appliances whose main functions are performed by motors and switching
or regulating devices,
unless the r.f. energy is intentionally generated or intended for
illumination.
It includes such equipment as: household electrical appliances, electric
tools, regulating controls using
semiconductor devices, motor-driven electro-medical apparatus,
!electric/electronic toys",
automatic dispensing machines as well as cine or slide projectors.
© BSI 14 July 2003

Furthermore, does the margin of 1-2dB over the limit line to which you refer
to take into consideration the measurement uncertainties associated with the
test? If not then the following may apply (taken from section 4.6.1 of UKAS
document LAB34):

"The measured result is above (below) the
specification limit by a margin less than the
measurement uncertainty; it is therefore not
possible to state compliance based on the
95% level of confidence. However, the result
indicates that compliance (non-compliance)
is more probable than non-compliance
(compliance) with the specification limit."



Ian Gordon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Wiseman [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 21 March 2005 16:42
> To: EMC-PSTC
> Subject: EN 61326-1 question
>
>
> All,
>
> I have been testing a clients unit that uses a universal AC
> motor.  The
> unit is intended to operate for 5-10 minutes and be idle for
> 30 minutes
> up to several hours before it is operated again.
>
> The unit currently will not meet the Class A radiated emissions limit,
> the QP value is 1-2 dB over the limit around 45 MHz.  Since
> this unit is
> meant for industrial environments I am curious if there is something
> that would allow this emission based on the duration of use.
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
> Josh
> --
> Josh Wiseman
> Owner, A2Z Compliance
> CE Lab Manager, L F Research
>

***********************************************************************
The information contained in this email and any attachments may be
confidential and is provided solely for the use of the intended recipient(s).
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail, its attachments or any
information contained  therein is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have
received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail and any attachments.

No responsibility is accepted for any virus or defect that might arise from
opening this e-mail or attachments, whether or not it has been checked by
anti-virus software.


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas             [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell            [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to