To follow up on previous message to group. The EUT that would be submitted for testing would mainly be considered ITE , CCTV and its peripherals. I am located in the Greater New York City area. Thanks again, RH
From: Reginald Henry Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 11:04 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: ETL vs. UL All, I know that most of the "general" population is aware of the UL mark applied to almost all appliances, equipment, etc, and that UL is the accepted safety marked to have on a company's product, at least here in the USA . However, because of UL's reduction in staff ( which is causing huge delays in getting service ), and because of some of their harsh treatment of "their clients" , I am sure a number of UL's "past clients" have successfully found alternative safety labs to submit their products to. I am investigation alternative safety labs ,ETL is a lab that keeps popping up as an alternative to UL. Would anyone please offer me any pros or cons in dealing with ETL ( I already know the Pros and Cons of UL ) ? Also , if you would or could inform me of the "level of acceptance" throughout the country that ETL has, I would also appreciated that information. I am already very much aware of the "broad based" acceptance of UL as "THE SAFETY INSTUTION" to go to. Regards, Reg Henry ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
