I wonder what OSHA and CSPI (Center for Science in the Public Interest) had
to say about broadcasting half a megawatt of rf power...

> From: Robert Johnson <[email protected]>
> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:12:57 -0500
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Limit on AM Broadcast power, USA
> 
> During WW II, WLW in Cincinnati broadcast at 500 KW in order to reach
> the interior farmland of the US using ten parallel 50 KW transmitters.
> Lots of annecdotes about singing fences, pickup in tooth fillings, etc.
> It returned to 50 Kw after the war.
> 
> Bob
> 
> Ken Javor wrote:
> 
>> All,
>> 
>> I need to know what the legal rf transmit power limit is for broadcasters in
>> the 530 to 1710 kHz AM broadcast band in the USA.  I believe the number is
>> 50 kW, but I have several questions:
>> 
>> 1) Is 50 kW correct?
>> 
>> 2)  Whether the correct answer to (1) is 50 kW or another number, does that
>> number represent effective radiated power?  That is, does the number include
>> antenna gain or is it just the transmitter power available at the antenna
>> input terminal?
>> 
>> 3) If the number is just transmit power, is 4 dBi a reasonable maximum gain
>> for a real-world AM broadcast antenna?
>> 
>> 4)  Whether the power figure is ERP or just power available to the antenna,
>> does it represent average or unmodulated power, or is it the envelope of
>> peak modulation?
>> 
>> Thank you in advance,
>> 
>> Ken Javor
>> 
>> -
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
>> emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>> 
>> To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
>> 
>> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html
>> 
>> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>> 
>> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>> 
>> Scott Douglas           [email protected]
>> Mike Cantwell           [email protected]
>> 
>> For policy questions, send mail to:
>> 
>> Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
>> David Heald:            [email protected]
>> 
>> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>> 
>> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
> emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> 
> To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
> 
> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html
> 
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> 
> Scott Douglas           [email protected]
> Mike Cantwell           [email protected]
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> 
> Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
> David Heald:            [email protected]
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> 
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to