Tim,
I agree that most emissions (for physically small EUT's) will be found to be
at maximum from 1 to 2 meters since at heights greater than 2 meters the
antenna begins to distance itself from the EUT. But go to 4 meters height as
called for in ANSI C63.4: 2003. Also, remember to bore-sight the antenna as
you raise it and encompass the EUT within the beam width of the antenna as
explained in the standard. Good quality cables and a properly placed pre-amp
can eliminate problems associated with cable loss.
 
Bill Stumpf
D.L.S. Electronics




From: [email protected]
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:48:55 EDT
To: [email protected]
Subject: Above 1 GHz EMI testing with horn antenna




Hello,

A discussion has come up about the need to raise the horn antenna up to 4
meters when doing an EMI test above 1 GHz.  ANSI states that the antenna
height should be adjusted between 1-4 meters to maximize the emissions.  Some
labs are only doing this test at 1 meter or maybe 2 meters high, (probably to
reduce cable loss issues).  Normally, the emissions are worst case below 2
meters, but how can one be absolutely sure, without checking?  What is the
legal requirement for the antenna height?  These questions apply to
unintentional radiators, where measurement above 1 GHz is required.

Regards,
Tim Pierce
- 2005 IEEE Symposium on Product Safety Engineering 3-4 October   Schaumburg,
IL http://www.ieee-pses.org/symposium 

---------------------------------------------------------------- This message
is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. 
  Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html 

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators: 

Scott Douglas             [email protected] Mike Cantwell           
[email protected] 

For policy questions, send mail to: 

Richard Nute:           [email protected] Jim Bacher:            
[email protected] 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 



- 2005 IEEE Symposium on Product Safety Engineering 3-4 October Schaumburg, IL
http://www.ieee-pses.org/symposium 

---------------------------------------------------------------- This message
is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 


To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 

- 2005 IEEE Symposium on Product Safety Engineering 3-4 October Schaumburg, IL
http://www.ieee-pses.org/symposium 

---------------------------------------------------------------- This message
is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 


To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 


Reply via email to