To All,

I have a small experience in buying standards. And 61326 make me big 
surprise.

An year ago I have bought from PKN (Polish Komitee for Norms(Standards)):
1. PN-EN 61326 February 2003
2. PN-EN 61326:2002/A3 December 2004

I supposed, that A3 without basic one will be nothing.
Then I found that position 1 is the French/English version, why position 2 
is the whole standard (with E and F annexes) and English only (less pages - 
smaller price).
So I see the position 1 can be destined for recycling only, but I can find 
the cheapest methods to collect the same amount of paper for that purpose.

So, how you buy standards ?
Should I begin from the AX (X=max) and if it contains no the whole standard 
I should buy the A(X-1) and so on ?

Best Regards

Piotr Galka


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Barnes" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; "John Woodgate" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: EN 61326:1997 Amendment A3:2003


> John,
> We have IEC 61326:2002.  My concern is that the C77 (March 31, 2005) and
> C246 (October 5, 2005) Official Journal of the European Union (OJ)
> published new Harmonized Standards for the EMC Directive 89/336/EEC,
> showing as the last item for EN 61326:1997:
>    "Amendment A3:2003 to EN 61326:1997    Note 3   1.10.2006"
>
> No reference standard for Amendment 3 is listed, and I've checked all of
> my sources for electronics standards in
>   http://www.dbicorporation.com/sources.htm
> without finding anyone so far who says they can supply this amendment OR
> a consolidated standard.
>
> On April 22, 2004 I asked this forum how IEC 61326:2002 differs from IEC
> 61326:1997 +A1:1998 +A2:2000.  On April 23, 2004, Helge Knudsen answered
> that IEC 61326:2002 added Annex E and Annex F.  So I *suspect* that
> Amendment A3:2003 to EN 61326:1997 also adds Annex E and F-- making EN
> 61326:1997 +A1:1998 +A2:2001 +A3:2003 identical to IEC 61326:2002.
>
> But maybe it doesn't...  which is what worries me.  I've been working
> heavily with European EMC/EMI/ESD standards for the last four years, and
> whenever I see "(Modified)" in a reference listing, I get nervous.  I've
> seen EN standards that differed from the reference CISPR or IEC
> standard only in the date of withdrawal of the superceded standard.
> Usually the EN standard adds an Annex ZA (normative) that lists the EN
> standards to be used in place of the IEC/CISPR standards listed in the
> reference standard.  I've seen one EN amendment, English pages only,
> that was almost double the size of the reference standard.  But this is
> the first time that I recall seeing an EN standard/amendment without a
> reference standard/amendment.
>
> Thanks!
>
> John Barnes KS4GL, PE, NCE, NCT, ESDC Eng, ESDC Tech, PSE, SM IEEE
> dBi Corporation
> http://www.dbicorporation.com/
>
>
>
> , and in April 2004 asked how it differed
>
>
> Woodgate wrote:
>>
>> In message <[email protected]>, dated Sun, 26 Feb 2006,
>> John Woodgate <[email protected]> writes
>>
>> >There is an IEC 61327:2002, which may be adopted by CENELEC to replace
>> >the 1997 edition of the EN.
>>
>> Oops! I meant IEC 61326:2002 of course.
>> --
>> OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
>> 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immoderately.
>>
>> John Woodgate
>>
>> -
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
>> emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>>
>> To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
>>
>> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
>>
>> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>>
>> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>>
>>      Scott Douglas           [email protected]
>>      Mike Cantwell           [email protected]
>>
>> For policy questions, send mail to:
>>
>>      Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
>>      David Heald:            [email protected]
>>
>> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>>
>>     http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
>
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
> emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>
> To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
>
> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
>
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>
>     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
>     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>
>     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
>     David Heald:            [email protected]
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>
>    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to