In message <[email protected]>, dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006, [email protected] writes >I assume that OATS will still be the standard, right? If a product's >compliance is in question, results from an OATS will take precedence >over any other test site such as FARs, T-Cell, etc.. Right? OR, does >the data from a FAR correlate so well with an OATS what they are >considered equivalent?
This is a complicated matter, and I think it's still not properly settled. But OATS will not take precedence; the two methods (OATS and FAR) will be equally valid. This does not extend to T-cell, I think. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immensely. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
