Forgot all about those impedance bridges, hybrid
transformers, and circulators/isolaters.  Directional
amplifiers.

Took the longest time using long hand [before PSPice] to
figure them out.  

My opinion: 
In the real world using real materials there is no better
transmittor/receiver setup than shielded cables containing
balanced line where the impedance between the two lines is
at least 3 times lower than the impedance to the shield.
 Doesn't easily radiate and is not very susceptible to
outside RFI/EMI.  Sadly, cost of cables and connectors
drives the selection process and I end up with coax.  

                    - Robert -

On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:11:35 +0100
 John Woodgate <[email protected]> wrote:
> In message <[email protected]>, dated Mon, 24
> Apr 2006, Robert A. Macy <[email protected]> writes
> 
> >I stand corrected.  yes, 600 ohm must be balanced
> because it is less than 377 for each line to infinite
> ground.
> > However, it is universally shoved through coax.
> 
> Almost no-one uses 600 ohm audio these days, and those
> that do use it balanced. What is put through
> single-screened cable (not usually called coax) is
> consumer audio, which isn't 600 ohms; it comes from a 2
> kohm or less source into a 10 kohm or greater load. Or at
> least, it should do.
> >
> >           - Robert -
> >
> >PS:  I still think "voltage" came first.  <g>
> 
> Even the BBC may have been a bit confused about that 30
> years ago, but once you see that the source and load
> impedances [1] form a balanced bridge, so that the
> common-mode signal does not appear in the differential
> signal, you wonder why anyone ever thought that the
> signal voltages mattered.
> 
> Another way of looking at it is to consider whether a
> circuit ceases to be balanced if the signal is turned
> off.
> 
> [1] To see this, you need to put an equal impedance in
> each leg at the sending end and an equal impedance in
> each leg at the receiving end. The impedances need not,
> indeed should not, be the same at both ends; the
> sensitivity of the balance to impedance tolerances is
> less if the impedances are very different, e.g. 37.5 ohms
> in each leg at the sending end and 10 kohms in each leg
> at the receiving end.
> -- 
> OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and
> www.isce.org.uk
> 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immensely.
> 
> John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh,
> Essex UK
> 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to