That sounds like an excellent suggestion to me.  It does raise one unrelated
question in my mind, because I know little about Ethernet.  This is just for
my own understanding, it doesn't bear on the original post.  Why is it you
can get 100 MHz on "phone-line" type Ethernet cable, but only 10 MHz when on
coax?  Seems like it ought to be just the reverse.

> From: [email protected]
> Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:23:52 -0500
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Chamber transition panels
> 
> Hello Gary,
> 
> May I suggest going to older Ethernet hardware?  There are 10BaseT to
> 10Base2 Ethernet adapters.  You may have to look in a computer resale shop
> to find this older hardware.  This will get you to the older 50 ohm coaxial
> Ethernet connection.  You should have no trouble getting the coax through
> the wall.  You will be limited to 10 megabits/second, but that may be
> sufficient.
> 
> Ted Eckert
> American Power Conversion Corporation
> 
> The items contained in this e-mail reflect the personal opinions of the
> writer and are only provided for the assistance of the reader. The writer
> is not speaking in an official capacity for APC nor representing APC's
> official position on any matter.
> 
> 
> 
> "McInturff Gary" 
> <GMcInturff@spray
> cool.com>                                                  To
> Sent by:                  <[email protected]>
> [email protected]                                          cc
> 
> Subject 
> 08/30/2006 01:52          Chamber transition panels
> PM               
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dumb question maybe
>             I have to get a UTP Ethernet connection out of a
semi-anechoic
> chamber. There no anti-chamber so any unfiltered cable routing opening is a
> major leak because of the opening and the induced noise on the cable
> itself. Since Ethernet signals don¹t like to be filtered. I¹m considering
> two options ­ neither of them make me real happy.
> 1) Find, if one exists, some sort of metallic RJ-45 bulkhead
> transition connectors and mount that into the transition panel. I¹ve
> seen the plastic versions for inter-connecting Ethernet cables, but
> the were neither metallic nor bulkhead mounted.
> 2) Make an air dielectric waveguide out of foot or so 1Ž2 inch metal
> pipe and attach that to the transition panel and route the cable
> through the ³wave guide² The opening itself even at 1Ž2 is larger than
> 18 GHz upper test frequency, but the width of the wave guide buys me
> some attenuation ­ and I don¹t expect to see much in the way of
> ambient up that high anyway.
> 
> I don¹t have an option of putting the test gear into the chamber with the
> EUT. The test gear would be a worse problem.
> I don¹t think this is completely brain dead but don¹t see any easier
> solution, but this doesn¹t address any induced ambient noise on the cable.
> Your thoughts?
> Thanks
> Gary
> 
> 
> - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
> message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
> discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> 
> 
> To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
> 
> 
> Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> 
> 
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
> 
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> 
> 
> Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected]
> 
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> 
> 
> Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected]
> 
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> 
> 
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> 
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
> emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> 
> To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
> 
> Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
> 
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> 
> Scott Douglas           [email protected]
> Mike Cantwell           [email protected]
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> 
> Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
> David Heald:            [email protected]
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> 
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to