How about finding an ethernet common mode choke and putting it between two RJ
connectors in a waveguide?  

 

Just my thought – they work when exiting products to keep the noise inside
the Faraday cage.  Should be simple enough to solder up then you just have to
figure out how to mount it (or just tape it up really well)  :-) 

 

-Dave

 




David Heald

EMC Engineer | Worldwide Regulatory Compliance

tel: +1.631.738.5373

fax: +1.631.738.5520

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of McInturff Gary
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 2:52 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Chamber transition panels

 

Dumb question maybe

            I have to get a UTP Ethernet connection out of a semi-anechoic
chamber. There no anti-chamber so any unfiltered cable routing opening is a
major leak because of the opening and the induced noise on the cable itself.
Since Ethernet signals don’t like to be filtered. I’m considering two
options – neither of them make me real happy. 

1) Find, if one exists, some sort of metallic RJ-45 bulkhead transition
connectors and mount that into the transition panel. I’ve seen the plastic
versions for inter-connecting Ethernet cables, but the were neither metallic
nor bulkhead mounted.

2) Make an air dielectric waveguide out of foot or so ½ inch metal pipe and
attach that to the transition panel and route the cable through the “wave
guide” The opening itself even at ½ is larger than 18 GHz upper test
frequency, but the width of the wave guide buys me some attenuation – and I
don’t expect to see much in the way of ambient up that high anyway. 

 

I don’t have an option of putting the test gear into the chamber with the
EUT. The test gear would be a worse problem. 

I don’t think this is completely brain dead but don’t see any easier
solution, but this doesn’t address any induced ambient noise on the cable.

Your thoughts?

Thanks

Gary


________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for computer viruses.


________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for computer viruses.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc -
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message
is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 


To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc


Reply via email to