Hi Mark & Bill,
 
Thanks for the information. I was talking about the peak reading. The
quasi-peak reading would be only a couple of dB lower than the peak if you
wait for the max signal. Otherwise, the quasi-peak signal was floor noise
because the signal goes away.
 
I agree that this type of reading should be taken.  Should the quasi-peak
reading be taken at maximum? i.e wait for the signal to come in?
 
Thanks,
Tim Pierce



  _____  

AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from
AOL at  <http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/
615326657x4311227241x4298082137/aol?redir=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eaol%2Ecom>
AOL.com. 

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 


Reply via email to