Neven,

It is not unusual to see 2-6 dB variation on emissions due to different
SDRAM vendor, considering that each of them could use different die
process, different drive strength, and different ODT technology ( or the
lack of such ). I have observed this both in SDRAMs and DDRS.
Unfortunately we are using different size of memory other than those
your application. So I am not sure our observation can be applied to 2MB
and 8 MB 

The challenges of cheery-picking SDRAMS is that even with the same 8MB
part, the vendor may have multiple fabs or different substrate, or they
may do a process change ( such as die-shrink ) couple month down the
road into your production. Given these factors, you may want to consider
whether it is beneficial to improve your designs before it get launched.

However, if you do choose to constrain SDRAM vendor to get into
production, some simple bench top measurement can give you insight on
whether a particular SRAM will likely to generate less EMI than another
, with the same PCB design. The following two techniques are quick and
quite reliable as a 1st pass look. :

1) measure the Data lines' waveshape, close to uC, during memory read (
ie, when data line were driven by DDR ) , compare rise time and
waveshape 

2) near -filed probe measurment on DDR part during memory read or write
session 


Of course, this assumes that you have already determined that the SDRAM
part itself is the dominate noise source.

Hope this helps.


Catherine Xu
__________________________________

Sr. Hardware Design Engineer, Ph.D.
HP IJS  - San Diego
_________________________________





From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 1:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Best SDRAM for Low-Emission?

Hello everyone,

 

I have a 2-layer PCB design, plastic enclosure, using 120 MHz SDRAM, two
stuffing options: 2MB (16 Mb) in 50-pin tsop package or 8MB (64 Mb) in
52-pin tsop.

 

It is slightly above class B radiated emission at the multiples of 120
MHz. I troubleshot it and I determined the SDRAM is the only source of
the failing frequencies, everything else is quiet.

 

I wonder if anyone has looked in how various manufacturers' memory chips
perform emission-wise, particularly the type that I am using. I hope to
find a manufacturer who makes "quieter" modules, so I do not need to
change anything else on my board.

 

If anyone has done such a comparison/investigation, I would appreciate
if you would be willing to share, on-line or off-line, the results -
which memory/manufacturer works best EMI-wise in such conditions.

 

Regards, Neven

- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 

Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators: 

Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 

For policy questions, send mail to: 

Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to