Hello,

Now, I have a question about interpretation of IEC 61000-4-4 ed.2
clause 6.2.2 about verification of CDNs.

I believed that waveform at output of the CDNs must be verified
for the requirements in clause 6.2.2 of the standard, by applying
the pulse to all the lines simultaneously (e.g., L+N+PE), because
IEC 61000-4-4 ed.2 clause 6.2.2 says

   The waveform shall be verified at the ***common mode output***
   of the coupling/decoupling network with a single 50 ohm terminator.
   ...
   The functionality verification of each single coupling/decoupling
   path is recommended.

and it is also the injection mode to be used for tests.

However, a test equipment manufacturer told us that they verify
their test generators / CDNs by applying the pulse to each of
the lines one by one (i.e., L only, N only, ...) and output voltage
at output of their CDNs may dropped significantly when pulse is
applied to multiple lines simultaneously, and the generators / CDNs
are IEC 61000-4-4 ed.2 compliant, even if the voltage at output of
the CDNs are out of tolerance when applied to multiple lines.

My question is, is the manufacturer's interpretation correct?

Does anyone here have information related to this issue?

Regards,
Tom


Tomonori Sato  <[email protected]>
URL: http://homepage3.nifty.com/tsato/

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to