In message <003101c77bde$b464ce90$0500a8c0@Pete97219Compaq>, dated Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Pete Perkins <[email protected]> writes:
> I have my own way of answering these questions; starting >with the list of items in the safety standard and adding the usual >suspects based upon my understanding of the markets that the company is >trying to serve. But, I confess, the list is regurgitated ad-hoc with >each request. I find that incorrect nameplates are a very common 'formal' reason to fail a product on pre-compliance safety assessment. So I have a graphics file of a 'typical' label, showing all the items required in Europe, which I give to the client. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
