In message <051020072244.3314.4643A053000DEB7A00000CF22200760180CECE020A900A02@comca st.net>, dated Thu, 10 May 2007, [email protected] writes:
>I do not intend to enter into a situation in which you request that I >prove everything I write, I don't think GG did that; he asked for SOME hard information, which you have given. >as I do not expect everyone on this list to be interested or expert in >all these matters, so with kind regards I am concluding this discussion >with you. You won't get very far in the standards world if you take umbrage at the first indication of dissent from your views. You must be prepared to continue to debate, possibly for a considerable time. I find that some of my proposals take two or three years to transform form heresy to dogma. (;-) -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
