Hello, I have a client who has a very limited budget for a small pre-compliance semi-anechoic chamber. What is the smallest chamber size that one can use for making decent RE (e.g., compliance levels of +/- 6dB in the low range and +/- 4dB in the upper range to the calculated NSA) and RI measurements in a 3-meter antenna distance and for a 70 cm3 test/EUT volume? Could a 5x3x3 meter chamber be used as a good pre-compliance chamber for RE measurements? If not, what is the most optimum size, considering that one has accepted a limited scan height.
Would you have contact the information for a reasonable source for 10x10x6.7 mm Ferrite Tiles? The same for the absorber cones; I am aiming to use the chamber up to the 20 GHz. Thanks in advance for taking the time to share your experience and lessons-learned. Take care, Oscar - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
