In message <[email protected]>, dated Fri, 
27 Apr 2007, Brian O'Connell <[email protected]> writes:

>I have read some published lit from a member of TC108, whom said that 
>as 62368 was a "Hazard Based Standard", that is would not, in fact, 
>replace 60950-1 and 60065 because it was a 'new' std. HUH???

Indeed, 'huh???'.
>
>So will this std be considered a normative ref for IT and A/V safety, 
>or will it eventually replace these stds ?

I'm not sure I understand that sentence. I think the origin of your 
contact's statement about 'new' is that considerable concern is being 
expressed that, instead of being a restructured and updated version of 
the two current standards, drafts of 62368 include a great many more, 
and a great many different, requirements compared to the current 
standards.

Nevertheless, the project proposal is clearly about a standard to 
replace 60065 and 60950, not something to stand alongside them on an 
on-going basis. Obviously, there will be a transition period in Europe, 
and the duration of that is a hot potato, too.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to