Ed,

I have no special knowledge of the standard to which you are working, but you
and I and everyone on this forum knows that a conducted measurement at an
antenna port is much superior in accuracy and much quicker to make than a
radiated measurement.  The only added complexity is a tuned notch filter to
protect the receiver, if necessary.  Further, EIRP means the transmit power
multiplied by the main lobe gain of the attached antenna.  Presumably someone
knows that main lobe gain, so all you need is the transmit power.  

Also, if possible I would make that conducted measurement with a 1 MHz
bandwidth, no extrapolation necessary there either.

Your sweeps will (theoretically) take about 100 us. I believe the fastest
sweeps most analyzers make is about 20 ms.  You can use no video filtering at
all, put the analyzer on max hold and just wait to see if anything crops up.
If it doesn't you're done.  If something does crop up, then you can zoom in on
it and maybe do a zero span and check its duty cycle.  Also I am guessing that
this limit protects GPS reception.  I would be careful of extrapolating a 10
kHz measurement to 1 MHz, if it doesn't extrapolate that way on the screen. 
GPS or whatever it is that has this wide bandwidth is desensitized by the sum
total of all power within its bandwidth, and extrapolating a 10 kHz signal to
1 MHz will overestimate the in-band power by orders of magnitude if the signal
isn't actually  1 MHz wide.

Ken Javor



From: "Price, Ed" <[email protected]>
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 08:58:24 -0700
To: "'IEEE EMC & SAFETY PSTC'" <[email protected]>
Subject: FCC R&R Part 25




I have a couple of questions about testing Land Mobile Ground Stations in
accordance with FCC R&R, Part 25. Section 25.216(i) says:
The peak e.i.r.p density of carrier-off state emissions from mobile earth
stations manufactured more than six months after Federal Register publication
of the rule changes adopted in FCC 03­283 with assigned uplink frequencies
between 1 and 3 GHz shall not exceed -80 dBW/MHz in the 1559­1610 MHz band
averaged over any 2 millisecond active transmission interval.
Since the FCC says "eirp" density, the I assume that means that the signal is
to be measured as it radiates from the EUT. (The EUT has a separate discrete
antenna, connected to the EUT by a length of coax cable.) Am I correct that I
can't measure the "eirp" density by looking into the coax cable; that I have
to do a measurement of the radiated field?

Do the units of "dBW/MHz" imply that, if I measured using a 10 kHz resolution
bandwidth, I would have to add a bandwidth factor of 20 dB to normalize the
observed data to a 1 MHz bandwidth?

Finally, how does one take a 2 millisecond "average"?

Thanks in advance!

Ed Price
[email protected]     WB6WSN
NARTE Certified EMC Engineer & Technician
Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
Cubic Defense Applications
San Diego, CA  USA
858-505-2780 (Voice)
858-505-1583 (FAX)
Military & Avionics EMC Is Our Specialty

- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 

For help, send mail to the list administrators: 

Scott Douglas           [email protected] Mike Cantwell          
[email protected] 

For policy questions, send mail to: 

Jim Bacher:             [email protected] David Heald:           
[email protected] 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 

http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 




______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 


Reply via email to