In message <[email protected]>, dated Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Brian Jones <[email protected]> writes:
>My text that you quote below is from the Guide. I know that this is >not legislation, but the Guide will be read by enforcement authorities >as well as manufacturers, so enforcement authorities may be expecting >this information on the DoC. I don't disagree, but I think people can use their own judgement. If there are only a few references, then they could be on the DoC. If, however, there are many, the DoC could even look designed to confuse and obscure! In that case, I think it would be perfectly reasonable to state, 'The non-harmonised standards or specifications that have been applied are listed in the above-mentioned technical documentation.' -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
