Ken Javor <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm not advocating elimination of radiated testing, but simply recognizing that emissions emanating from long cables are more accurately measured and controlled as currents than as fields, not to mention much less expensively. For precisely the same reason that 61000-4-6 is performed in lieu of 61000-4-3 below 80 MHz. And, I suppose, why 55014 uses the absorber clamp method instead of a radiated test. Bob Richards, NCT. - ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
