In message <of6b4a0472.5575cff7-on862572e8.004703a4-862572e8.00484...@mmm.com>, dated Sun, 27 May 2007, rehel...@mmm.com writes:
>For those of you who are on writing committees or have contacts with >them, can you tell me what are the highest frequencies being considered >for emissions testing and immunity? The DRAFT CISPR 32 (to replace CISPR 13 and 22) goes up to 6 GHz for radiated emissions, but that might change, except for outdoor units of satellite broadcast receivers, for which the upper limit is 18 GHz. The DRAFT CISPR 35 (to replace CISPR 20 and 24) goes up to 1 GHz for immunity to radiated emissions, but that might change. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
