In message <[email protected]>, dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007, S Wall <[email protected]> writes:
>Wouldn't EN 50130-4 be more appropriate for Immunity/Susceptibility? >Components of CCTV systems for security applications are covered within >the scope of this standard. 'Surveillance' may not be a 'security' matter. 50130-4 is a tough one if it's not essential. >Depending on the component type EN 55022 or EN 61000-6-3 may be more >appropriate for Emissions, the latter being referenced in Guide 25 >(Edition 2). Appealing to standards outside their scope, or to a Generic when there is an applicable product-family standard, are very ill-advised. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
