In message <[email protected]>, dated Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Scott Xe <[email protected]> writes:
>Many thanks for your reply and advice. We had a bad experience in >hiring the world largest accredited laboratory to do such investigation >long time ago but unfortunately it came back with unsatisfactory result. You should understand that this is liable to happen when you get a report full of waffle. In fact, the real answer is 'We don't know', but there is a corporate ban on admitting that. (;-) > Do you have any idea any public body available for similar specific >service? Stick to your friendly neighbourhood fire-person. They don't mind (usually) saying 'We don't know'. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
