One hopes that the 4C difference would be accounted for in the
temperature limits imposed by most standards.  If I found a spot within
4C of a limit, I'd take a harder look at things anyway.

If it's 35C at MSL, what's the air temperature at 2000m?  Perhaps it's
down by more than 4C.


Ralph McDiarmid, AScT
Compliance Engineering Group
Xantrex Technology Inc


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul
Lovell
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 2:51 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Max. ambient temperature

On a slightly different track, what about the thermal effects of
altitude?  60950-1 and 60601-1 are deemed to 'work' up to 2000m
elevation, but most of the labs (I would assume) are at, or close to,
sea level.  However, it's well known (in the NEBS world at least) that
the thinning of the air will lead to increased internal temperatures at
a rate of approx 1C per 500m elevation, so a device running in a 25C
ambient will be about 4C hotter inside (ie windings etc) at 2000m than
at sea level.  I've wondered for some time why the safety standards
don't take this into account although they make allowances for minimum
clearance distances at higher altitude. 

Is this just an error of omission or is the effect too small to be
significant?  I remember in my BSI Testing days that we would
occasionally have products which only just passed the heating test
without considering the effect this might have at 2000m: it just wasn't
'on the radar'.

I'd be interested in any thoughts you might have on this.

Best regards,

Paul Lovell
Group Compliance Manager
Huntleigh Technology
Tel: +44 (0)1582 745891
Mob: +44 (0)791 956 5599

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John
Woodgate
Sent: 07 September 2007 10:08
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Max. ambient temperature

In message 
<1f5308c5923f3b4daa51d189bf25500602978...@edgmsmail01.eu.thmulti.com>, 
dated Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Carpentier Kristiaan 
<[email protected]> writes:

>Which IEC standard gives this classification?

For example, IEC 60065. However, the information is not obvious and 
there is an error, which I will take up with the relevant committee.

4.1.3 gives the upper ambient temperature limit as 35 C 'unless 
otherwise specified'. In the 'conditions applicable' of Table 3, the 
explanation of '35 C for temperate climates and 45 C for tropical 
climates' is given, but attributed in error only to reference 'a' in the

table, which is 'metallic enclosures'. This was corrected in Corrigendum

1, where metallic enclosures were given reference 'b', but now there is 
no reference 'a' in the table at all! It should be added to the headings

of the columns 'Normal operating conditions' and 'Fault conditions'.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of
2.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned on behalf of Huntleigh Technology PLC for
all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. 
________________________________________________________________________

The information contained in this electronic mail, including all
attachments are intended only for the personal use of the designated
recipient named and is confidential and may also contain privileged
company information or work product.  The information is intended only
for the use of the individual, individuals, or entity to whom the
electronic mail is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
electronic mail in error, please return to us immediately.  Thank you.

This email has been scanned on behalf of Huntleigh Technology PLC for
all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service.

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to