In message <1f5308c5923f3b4daa51d189bf25500602978...@edgmsmail01.eu.thmulti.com>, dated Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Carpentier Kristiaan <[email protected]> writes:
>Which IEC standard gives this classification? For example, IEC 60065. However, the information is not obvious and there is an error, which I will take up with the relevant committee. 4.1.3 gives the upper ambient temperature limit as 35 C 'unless otherwise specified'. In the 'conditions applicable' of Table 3, the explanation of '35 C for temperate climates and 45 C for tropical climates' is given, but attributed in error only to reference 'a' in the table, which is 'metallic enclosures'. This was corrected in Corrigendum 1, where metallic enclosures were given reference 'b', but now there is no reference 'a' in the table at all! It should be added to the headings of the columns 'Normal operating conditions' and 'Fault conditions'. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
