In message <[email protected]>, dated Fri, 24 Aug 2007, "Tarver, Peter" <[email protected]> writes:
>Since the Seebeck Effect and Peltier Effect are supposed to be >essentially the inverse of one another, this might prove an interesting >experiment. Although, the voltages involved in thermocouples is >smaller than any power supply I have in my lab can regulate to. You don't need a very low voltage. Just put a resistor in series - a lamp would give you some regulation of the current but it is unlikely to be necessary. The cooling effect with the materials used for temperature measurement is minute. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
