Hello John:

> I've never measured the 'frequency response' (trip current vs.
> frequency) of a GFCI (they don't occur in UK, we have RCCBs) but I 
> suspect that the trip current is higher than the design value 
> at higher 
> frequencies.

As far as I know, there is no frequency compensation in
the GFCI.  The frequency response is determined by the
core characteristics and the IC amplifier characteristics.

Virtually all US/Canada GFCIs use the National Semiconductor 
LM1851 IC.  The data sheet includes some good information on 
GFCI circuits and circuit performance.  There are no frequency 
response specs that I could find.  Here is the URL for the 
LM1851 and data sheet:

    http://www.national.com/mpf/LM/LM1851.html

Here is another web site for GFCI information:

    http://www.codecheck.com/gfci_principal.htm

The original question pointed out that the leakage current 
was in spec, but the load nevertheless tripped the GFCI.
The only conclusion is that the leakage current meter and
the GFCI do not have the same measuring circuits -- which
they don't.  We do know that the leakage current measuring 
network accounts for the response of the body to frequency, 
while the GFCI has no such metering circuit network.
    

Best regards,
Rich


Richard Nute
Product Safety Consultant
San Diego

   

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to