On 2/25/2008, Wendy wrote:


I would like to know if anyone has tested products using EN55024:1998 A1:2001.
>From the text of the standard (acoustic sound level), products subjected to
this amendment should be a Telecommunication equipment which carries
voice/sound signals, perhaps a telephone. 
 
A Customer whose product is a simple USB Printer is requesting that I add this
amendment in the test report. I did not since it was not applicable and most
importantly ­ not tested.
 
Is my understanding correct? 



Hi Wendy:

I agree with you that the tests referenced in Amendment A1:2001 would not
apply to a simple USB printer.  However, I think that technically, the
complete standard that is in force today is EN55024:1998 +A1 + A2, and that it
is no longer acceptable to use a report that only considers EN55024:1998
without the amendments.  I often have difficulty sorting out these transition
dates, so I may be mistaken on this.

It should be simple enough to revise your report to include A1 (and A2), and
then simply indicate "not applicable" for any provisions in A1 and A2 that do
not apply to the equipment under test.




Joe Randolph
Telecom Design Consultant
Randolph Telecom, Inc.
781-721-2848 (USA)
[email protected]
http://www.randolph-telecom.com <http://www.randolph-telecom.com/> 


- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 


Reply via email to