I recommend looking at IEC 60950-1 Annex J.  It gives the electrochemical
potentials between various dissimilar metals and sets a limit of 0.6 V for
the electrochemical potential.  Zinc plating to gold could be a problem.
The type of stainless steel used will also affect corrosion, so you will
need to know if you are using austenitic stainless or chromium stainless.

Ted Eckert
American Power Conversion/MGE
http://www.apc.com/

The items contained in this e-mail reflect the personal opinions of the
writer and are only provided for the assistance of the reader. The writer
is not speaking in an official capacity for APC-MGE or Schneider Electric.
The speaker does not represent APC-MGE's or Schneider Electric's official
position on any matter.


                                                                           
             "Marko Radojicic"                                             
             <mradojicic@strat                                             
             alight.com>                                                To 
             Sent by:                  <[email protected]>                 
             [email protected]                                          cc 
                                                                           
                                                                   Subject 
             01/10/2008 01:57          Zinc passivation vs. Stainless      
             PM                        Steel hardware selection            
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




Hello,

If anyone has a materials background, your opinion would be appreciated.

We are specifying hardware (screws, washers) to assemble anodized aluminum
modules to gold PCB pads. These connections will also be providing
grounding and I would like to ensure long-term corrosion control.

The stack-up would thus look like the pancake below and hence have two
Galvanic interfaces to address:
                                 Aluminum
                              <screw, washer>
                                   Gold

The only two real choices for this type of hardware are stainless steel and
CRS (cold-rolled steel) with zinc passivation. I see from Wikipedia that
zinc is a preferred interface material for dissimilar metals but I’m not
quite sure I understand why (sacrificial anode?). Stainless is closer to
gold on the galvanic scale while zinc is almost at the other end.

The only rule-of-thumb that I’ve used in the past is 0.5V maximum Galvanic
potential difference for non-salt humidity (and 0.25V if in a salt humidity
environment).

This situation should be fairly common with aluminum heat-sinks mounted on
PCBAs as well. I thought I knew the best strategy but, like most things,
the more one pokes around, the more you find out you don’t know.

Thanks,
Marko

Marko Radojicic
Manager, Qualifications and Regulatory
StrataLight Communications, Inc.
151 Albright Way
Los Gatos, CA 95032
[email protected]
Desk: 408.385.3033
Cell: 650.575.3865



- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/


To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html


For help, send mail to the list administrators:


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected]


For policy questions, send mail to:


Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected]


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to