Hi Ian,

I had the unfortunate opportunity to attempt in-situ measurements of a
large telecom system about 12 years ago.

We found that getting useful measurements was very, very difficult. As
Bob notes, power-cycling the EUT helps to differentiate the noise source
but that may not always be possible if the customer has already
commissioned the equipment.

You'll find that the noise ambients are very high and confound
measurements. Getting a space where you can take even 3m measurements in
a 360 degree circle and be able to vary the antenna height 1-4m will
also be extremely improbable. There are few, if any, rooms that have
that much free space around an EUT.

Also the cabling can cause issues since it will most likely extend way
beyond where the EUT is (contrary to how testing is done at an OFS,
etc.). This may cause you to exceed the limit due to near-field effects.
On the other hand, the near-field effects may cause you to have
unreasonably good results - you just don't know. There is a lot of
associated failure risk that it may be wise to try to avoid (see 2nd to
last paragraph).

Don't forget that you will also have to take conducted measurements and
that any other device on that power feed circuit, or even on the entire
distribution, may cause you to fail. We had much less conducted
emissions margin that we wanted during our testing.

The logistics and cost associated with this testing was also
significantly higher than a normal EMC test. Getting a spectrum
analyzer, antenna, antenna mast, etc. reserved for all the testing took
a long time and caused other programs to suffer. This alone could be a
show-stopper for some companies.

If this unit is a one-of-a-kind, than I believe you only need this one
test. However if you are trying to provide a compliance document for
future production, the FCC required testing three units. This obviously
extends the time, cost, and PITA.

My best advice is to document all the issues involved with these
measurements and ask for another unit that you can take to an approved
test facility.

On the positive side, we had a lot of fun doing the measurements since
we got to see various installations and real-world deployment. :)

...Marko


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 5:03 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Fw: Radiated emission testing "in the real world"

In general the point is to be able to differentiate the ambient signals
>from the energy coming from the EUT. This is generally done by turning
the
EUT off to measure ambients and turning it on to determine noise from
the
EUT. Section 10.8 of CISPR 22 has some pointers on measurements made in
the
presence of ambients and you can probably find articles out on the web
as
well. For in-situ measurements I would not worry about the 6 dB (unless
it
precisely coincides with an EUT signal).

Bob Heller
3M EMC Laboratory, 76-1-01
St. Paul, MN 55107-1208
Tel:  651- 778-6336
Fax:  651-778-6252
=======================================================================



 

             "Gordon,Ian"

             <Ian.Gordon@edwar

             dsvacuum.com>
To 
             Sent by:                  [email protected]

             [email protected]
cc 
 

 
Subject 
             01/02/2008 05:40          Radiated emission testing "in the

             AM                        real world"

 

 

 

 

 

 





All
Happy New year.

Clause 6.1 of CISPR 11 requires that ambient noise levels to be 6dB
below
the specified limit. However for testing at a customer site i.e. not on
an
OATS or in a chamber the level of ambient emissions may be higher than
this
due to neighbouring factories or other sources.
Can anybody suggest how to achieve these measurements?

Ian Gordon


***********************************************************************
The information contained in this email and any attachments may be
confidential and is provided solely for the use of the intended
recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail, its
attachments or any information contained  therein is unauthorised and
prohibited. If you have received this in error, please contact the
sender
immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachments.

No responsibility is accepted for any virus or defect that might arise
from
opening this e-mail or attachments, whether or not it has been checked
by
anti-virus software.

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to