The intention of HAC is not to ensure compliance with network standards; but
to ensure that all persons with a hearing aid have equal access to their
telephony requirements at a quality that reflects the performance of persons
not using hearing aids.

 

Consider a possible future Payphone scenario where the telephone is now a
popular VoIP telephone acting as a payphone and serviced by a gateway and
proxy run by a major service provider and placed in a public place such as an
airport or hotel, where access is granted to all members of the public; and
billing is via membership or credit card.

 

In this instance the Gateway provides the route to compliance to the relevant
clauses of Part 68, also in this scenario HAC would almost certainly be
applicable, since the phone is part of the installation complete with a
handset.

 

Testing HAC isn’t impossible you should be able to test it to any G.711
64Kbit access point.

 

Regards

 

Carl

 

Carl Richards, 
Regulatory Compliance Manager, 
Aspect Software 
2, The Square

Stockley Park, Uxbridge, UB11 1AD, 

United Kingdom

 

+44 (0)208 589 1461 Office
+44 (0)870 460 1950 Fax

+44 (0)7875 27 1461  Mobile

[email protected]
www.aspect.com

 

Unified Communications for the Contact Center

 

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ron Pickard,
RPQ
Sent: 11 April 2008 01:58
To: 'McDougal, Bret (SHC US)'
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: VOIP Phones and HAC

 

Hi Bret,

 

I have to disagree. My disagreement is based on the scope of ANSI/TIA-968-A
found in clause 1.1. From the Scope’s opening paragraph: “This standard
specifies technical criteria for terminal equipment approved in accordance
with 47 CFR 68 for direct connection to the public switched telephone network,
including private line services provided over wireline facilities owned by
providers of wireline telecommunications. These technical criteria are
intended to protect the telephone network from the harms defined in 47 CFR
68.3.”

 

The emphasis is mine, but it clearly makes Part 68 applicable only to
equipment with a direct connection to the PSTN. Remember, Part 68’s intent
is to protect the PSTN from harm as is also stated in the scope. Therefore,
Part 68’s requirements should not apply to VoIP phones if they don’t
directly connect to the PSTN. 

 

Best regards,

Ron Pickard
RPQ Consulting
7372 West Luke Avenue
Glendale, AZ 85303
+623.512-3451 tel, +623.848-9033 fax
[email protected]

www.rpqconsulting.com

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of McDougal, Bret
(SHC US)
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 2:46 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: VOIP Phones and HAC

 

List Members, 

 

It appears that FCC Part 68 calls for all phones to be Hearing Aid Compatible
(HAC): 

Excerpt from FCC Part 68:

§ 68.4 Hearing aid-compatible telephones.

(a)(1) Except for telephones used with public mobile services, telephones used
with private radio services, and cordless and secure telephones, every
telephone manufactured in the United States (other than for export) or
imported for use in the United States after August 16, 1989, must be hearing
aid compatible, as defined in § 68.316. Every cordless telephone manufactured
in the United States (other than for export) or imported into the United
States after August 16, 1991, must be hearing aid compatible, as defined in §
68.316.
(2) Unless otherwise stated and except for telephones used with public mobile
services, telephones used with private radio services and secure telephones,
every telephone listed in § 68.112 must be hearing aid compatible, as defined
in § 68.316. 
(3) A telephone is hearing aid-compatible if it provides internal means for
effective use with hearing aids that are designed to be compatible with
telephones which meet established technical standards for hearing aid
compatibility.

 

However I am less clear about VOIP phones, as I do not believe they are
registered with ACTA.  Does Part 68 apply, or is there some other requirement
for VOIP phones to be HAC?

 

Best Regards,

 

Bret McDougal
PQA & ES                                 

This message and any attachments are solely for the use of intended
recipients. They may contain privileged and/or confidential information,
attorney work product or other information protected from disclosure. If you
are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you received this
email in error, and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of
this email and any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this email in error, please contact the sender and delete the message and any
attachment from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.

 

- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc -
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message
is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 


To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc -
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message
is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 


To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc


Reply via email to